Within the next step, the fresh design with the worry level once the centered varying is calculated

Within the next step, the fresh design with the worry level once the centered varying is calculated

In the Facebook user group, 32.9% of the variance was explained by the total model, F(9,780) = , p < .001. Stress symptoms were significantly associated with self-esteem (standardized beta = -.259, p < .001), narcissism (standardized beta = .144, p < .001), agreeableness (standardized beta = -.092, p < .01) and neuroticism (standardized beta = .386, p < .001). In the Facebook non-user group, 31.1% of the variance was explained by the total model, F(9,145) = 7.288, p < .001. Significant associations were found between stress symptoms and self-esteem (standardized beta = -.196, p < .05) as well as neuroticism (standardized beta = .411, p < .001).

Self-confident parameters from mental health and you can depression, anxiety, be concerned attacks.

Next, multiple regression analyses was basically determined into details years, intercourse, existence fulfillment, strength, public help and glee because separate variables and you will despair, stress and anxiety episodes, respectively, since based details.

In the Facebook user group, 46.8% of the variance of the depression scale was significantly explained by the total model, F(6,783) = , p < .001. Depression symptoms were significantly associated with age (standardized beta = -.084, p < .01), life satisfaction (standardized beta = -.226, p < .001), social support (standardized beta = -.117, p < .001) and happiness (standardized beta = -.397, p < .001). Happiness had the highest association with depression symptoms compared with the other independent variables of the model (no overlaps of the confidence intervals). In the Facebook non-user group, 55% of the variance of the depression scale was explained by the total model, F(6,148) = , p < .001. Depression symptoms were significantly associated with age (standardized beta = -.187, p < .01), life satisfaction (standardized beta = -.244, p < .05), resilience (standardized beta = -.178, p < .05) and happiness (standardized beta = -.321, p < .001).

Regression results for the anxiety scale showed that in the Facebook user group the total model explained 24.7% of the variance, F(6,783) = , p < .001. Anxiety symptoms were significantly associated with age (standardized beta = -.140, p < .001), gender (standardized beta = -.115, p < .001), life satisfaction (standardized beta = -.167, p < .001), social support (standardized beta = -.233, p < .001) and happiness (standardized beta = -.116, p < .01). In the Facebook non-user group, 35.9% of the variance was explained by the total model, F(6,148) = , p < .001. Significant associations were found between anxiety symptoms and age (standardized beta = -.179, p < .05), resilience (standardized beta = -.220, p < .05) as well as happiness (standardized beta = -.221, p < .05).

Furthermore, in the Facebook user group, the total model explained 28.4% of the variance of the stress scale, F(6,783) = , p < .001. Stress symptoms were significantly associated with age (standardized beta = -.107, p < .01), gender (standardized beta = -.149, p < .001), life satisfaction (standardized beta = -.194, p < .001) and happiness (standardized beta = -.312, p < .001). In the Facebook non-user group, 35.7% of the variance of the stress scale was explained by the total model, F(6,148) = , p < .001. Significant associations were found between stress symptoms and age (standardized beta = -.152, p < .05) as well as happiness (standardized beta = -.220, p < .05).

Dialogue

Today’s exploratory study is among the first analysis so you’re able to compare Fb profiles and you may Facebook low-profiles concerning at exactly the same time the partnership between personality traits and you will psychological state (negative and positive parameters).

Expose overall performance confirm the belief away from systematic differences when considering Facebook profiles and you may Twitter non-users. Fb profiles shown higher opinions away from narcissism (verification off Theory 1a) and you may extraversion than simply Myspace low-pages (verification of https://datingranking.net/pl/colombian-cupid-recenzja/ Hypothesis 1b). These types of overall performance end up like earlier results [48,49]. Particular studies constituted an optimistic organization ranging from narcissism and you will Myspace fool around with . It demonstrated intense Myspace pages due to the fact worry about-centric, egoistic and you may notice-pretty sure. On the other hand, such members is actually social and you will fascinating partners to possess shallow relationships one to frequently happen on the Facebook . Weighed against earlier result of studies used into the Myspace , in today’s study, Myspace pages and you will Fb low-profiles don’t disagree regarding the quantity of conscientiousness (opposing Hypothesis 1c). As well as no high variations away from agreeableness, neuroticism and openness have been discovered. It should be showcased that the present data merely concerned about the application of new SNS Facebook and don’t thought most other SNSs employed by the players of present research. Hence, all of the assumptions are only able to be made to the program Myspace.


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *